New Regionalism Reconsidered: Globalization and the Remaking of Political Economic Space
Identifieur interne : 000D18 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000D17; suivant : 000D19New Regionalism Reconsidered: Globalization and the Remaking of Political Economic Space
Auteurs : Gordon Macleod [Royaume-Uni]Source :
- International Journal of Urban and Regional Research [ 0309-1317 ] ; 2001-12.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Academic inquiry, Accumulation strategies, Active ingredients, Allen scott, Amin, Associational economy, Associative governance, Basic books, Basque country, Blackwell, Blackwell publishers, British geographers, Cambridge university press, Capital accumulation, Capitalist development, Capitalist state, Certain regions, Civil society, Competitive advantage, Concomitant rise, Critique, Cultural economy, Cultural industries, Development agencies, Discursive construction, Eastern europe, Economic development, Economic geography, Economic globalization, Economic governance, Economic growth, Economic life, Economic prosperity, Economic regulation, Economic sociology, Economic success, Economic transformation, Economic units, European journal, European union, External world, First concerns, Flexible production systems, Fourth section, Gale, Gender, Gender relations, Geographer, Geography, Gertler, Global, Global economy, Global governance, Global mosaic, Global order, Globalization, Goodwin, Gordon macleod, Governance, Harvard university press, Hegemonic projects, High technology, Human geography, Industrial decline, Industrial districts, Industrial spaces, Infrastructure, Institutional forms, Institutional spaces, Institutional thickness, Instructive, Interest groups, Internal structures, International institute, International journal, International relations, Interterritorial competition, Jessop, Joint editors, Keating, Labour, Labour studies, Little sense, Local governance, Local state, Macleod, Major source, Mass production, Michael keating, Oxford university press, Policy tail, Political economy, Political geography, Political regime, Political restructuring, Political science, Political scientists, Political structuration, Practical terms, Publisher, Recent reformulations, Reflexive, Reflexive capitalism, Regional, Regional actors, Regional advantage, Regional development, Regional development agencies, Regional development studies, Regional economies, Regional geography, Regional governance, Regional ideology, Regional interests, Regional level, Regional motors, Regional potentials, Regional problem, Regional research, Regional resurgence, Regional state, Regional studies, Regional studies association, Regional world, Regionalism, Regionalist, Regionalist accounts, Regionalist analysis, Regionalist discourses, Regionalist perspectives, Regionalist research, Regionalist writings, Regionalization, Regulation, Regulation approach, Regulationist research, Relational, Relational assets, Representational regime, Research strategies, Restructuring, Routledge, Sabel, Serious questions, Silicon, Silicon valley, Social base, Social capital, Social construction, Social regulation, Social relations, Social science, Social sciences, Soja, Spatial scales, Spatial selectivity, State form, State intervention, State managers, State power, State restructuring, State spaces, State strategies, Storper, Structuration, Successful regions, Swyngedouw, Technological innovation, Territorial government, Third section, Tickell, Time horizons, Uneven development, Uneven geography, Untraded interdependencies, Unwin hyman, Urban governance, Urban politics, Urban regimes, Urban theory, Valuable insights, Various scholars, Vital factor, Western europe, Whole range.
Abstract
Amid the near frenzied exaltation of economic globalization and a purported decline of the nation state, a range of subnational regional economies and urban metropoles are increasingly being canonized as the paradigmatic exemplars of wealth creation. Indeed, across many of the advanced developed countries a whole host of academics, consultants, influential commentators, politicians and bourgeois interest groups are readily invoking the region to be the appropriate site for regulating global capitalism. In a recent article in IJURR, though, John Lovering disputes this emerging New Regionalism, viewing it to be seriously compromised by several practical and theoretical inadequacies. This article has two principal aims. First, and while sympathetic to the general tenor of Lovering’s critique, it offers a rejoinder through some sobering reflections on what might be recovered from the range of New Regionalist perspectives currently vying for attention within critical studies of regional development. Second, it presents a series of future theoretical directions for a geopolitically sensitive regional research agenda, drawing on recent thinking from the new regional geography, globalization and the politics of scale, institutional‐relational state theory and the regulation approach. An argument is made that a synthesis of these perspectives might intensify our understanding of the social and political construction of regions, the uneven geography of growth, and the moments of re‐scaled regionalized state power that now enframe the process of economic governance.
Au milieu de la quasi‐frénésie de la mondialisation économique et d’un soi‐disant déclin de l’État‐nation, diverses économies régionales et métropoles urbaines se trouvent – en nombre croissant –élevées au rang de modèles de création de richesses. En effet, dans beaucoup de pays avancés, tout un tas de groupes d’intérêt – universitaires, consultants, commentateurs reconnus, politiciens, bourgeois – invoquent volontiers la région comme lieu pertinent de la régulation du capitalisme mondial. Dans un récent article publié dans IJURR, John Lovering contestait cependant ce Nouveau Régionalisme naissant, plusieurs insuffisances pratiques et théoriques risquant de le compromettre, selon lui. Le présent article a deux objectifs principaux: d’une part, quoique sensible à la teneur générale de la critique de Lovering, il répond par quelques réflexions modérées sur ce qui pourrait être récupéré des diverses perspectives du Nouveau Régionalisme qui cherchent actuellement à attirer l’attention dans le cadre d’études critiques sur l’aménagement régional; d’autre part, l’article présente une série d’orientations théoriques futures pour un programme de recherche régional à tendance géopolitique, s’inspirant des dernières réflexions sur la nouvelle géographie régionale, la mondialisation et la politique d’échelle, ainsi que la théorie de l’état institutionnel‐relationnel et l’approche de la régulation. Il démontre ensuite qu’une synthèse de ces perspectives pourrait nous permettre de mieux comprendre la construction sociale et politique des régions, la géographie irrégulière de la croissance, ainsi que les phases d’un État redessinéà l’échelle régionale, lesquelles encadrent désormais le processus de gouvernance économique.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/1468-2427.00345
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 001544
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 001444
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000B09
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000D19
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000D18
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">New Regionalism Reconsidered: Globalization and the Remaking of Political Economic Space</title><author><name sortKey="Macleod, Gordon" sort="Macleod, Gordon" uniqKey="Macleod G" first="Gordon" last="Macleod">Gordon Macleod</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:D1D47EE35825136F33933E05A11A2D938F95944B</idno><date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/1468-2427.00345</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/D1D47EE35825136F33933E05A11A2D938F95944B/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">001544</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">001544</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">001444</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000B09</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000B09</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0309-1317:2001:Macleod G:new:regionalism:reconsidered</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000D19</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000D18</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000D18</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">New Regionalism Reconsidered: Globalization and the Remaking of Political Economic Space</title><author><name sortKey="Macleod, Gordon" sort="Macleod, Gordon" uniqKey="Macleod G" first="Gordon" last="Macleod">Gordon Macleod</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr" wicri:curation="lc">Royaume-Uni</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Geography and International Centre for Regional Regeneration and Development Studies, University of Durham, Durham</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Durham</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">International Journal of Urban and Regional Research</title><idno type="ISSN">0309-1317</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-2427</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishers Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK and Boston, USA</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2001-12">2001-12</date><biblScope unit="volume">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="804">804</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="829">829</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0309-1317</idno></series><idno type="istex">D1D47EE35825136F33933E05A11A2D938F95944B</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/1468-2427.00345</idno><idno type="ArticleID">IJUR345</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0309-1317</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Academic inquiry</term><term>Accumulation strategies</term><term>Active ingredients</term><term>Allen scott</term><term>Amin</term><term>Associational economy</term><term>Associative governance</term><term>Basic books</term><term>Basque country</term><term>Blackwell</term><term>Blackwell publishers</term><term>British geographers</term><term>Cambridge university press</term><term>Capital accumulation</term><term>Capitalist development</term><term>Capitalist state</term><term>Certain regions</term><term>Civil society</term><term>Competitive advantage</term><term>Concomitant rise</term><term>Critique</term><term>Cultural economy</term><term>Cultural industries</term><term>Development agencies</term><term>Discursive construction</term><term>Eastern europe</term><term>Economic development</term><term>Economic geography</term><term>Economic globalization</term><term>Economic governance</term><term>Economic growth</term><term>Economic life</term><term>Economic prosperity</term><term>Economic regulation</term><term>Economic sociology</term><term>Economic success</term><term>Economic transformation</term><term>Economic units</term><term>European journal</term><term>European union</term><term>External world</term><term>First concerns</term><term>Flexible production systems</term><term>Fourth section</term><term>Gale</term><term>Gender</term><term>Gender relations</term><term>Geographer</term><term>Geography</term><term>Gertler</term><term>Global</term><term>Global economy</term><term>Global governance</term><term>Global mosaic</term><term>Global order</term><term>Globalization</term><term>Goodwin</term><term>Gordon macleod</term><term>Governance</term><term>Harvard university press</term><term>Hegemonic projects</term><term>High technology</term><term>Human geography</term><term>Industrial decline</term><term>Industrial districts</term><term>Industrial spaces</term><term>Infrastructure</term><term>Institutional forms</term><term>Institutional spaces</term><term>Institutional thickness</term><term>Instructive</term><term>Interest groups</term><term>Internal structures</term><term>International institute</term><term>International journal</term><term>International relations</term><term>Interterritorial competition</term><term>Jessop</term><term>Joint editors</term><term>Keating</term><term>Labour</term><term>Labour studies</term><term>Little sense</term><term>Local governance</term><term>Local state</term><term>Macleod</term><term>Major source</term><term>Mass production</term><term>Michael keating</term><term>Oxford university press</term><term>Policy tail</term><term>Political economy</term><term>Political geography</term><term>Political regime</term><term>Political restructuring</term><term>Political science</term><term>Political scientists</term><term>Political structuration</term><term>Practical terms</term><term>Publisher</term><term>Recent reformulations</term><term>Reflexive</term><term>Reflexive capitalism</term><term>Regional</term><term>Regional actors</term><term>Regional advantage</term><term>Regional development</term><term>Regional development agencies</term><term>Regional development studies</term><term>Regional economies</term><term>Regional geography</term><term>Regional governance</term><term>Regional ideology</term><term>Regional interests</term><term>Regional level</term><term>Regional motors</term><term>Regional potentials</term><term>Regional problem</term><term>Regional research</term><term>Regional resurgence</term><term>Regional state</term><term>Regional studies</term><term>Regional studies association</term><term>Regional world</term><term>Regionalism</term><term>Regionalist</term><term>Regionalist accounts</term><term>Regionalist analysis</term><term>Regionalist discourses</term><term>Regionalist perspectives</term><term>Regionalist research</term><term>Regionalist writings</term><term>Regionalization</term><term>Regulation</term><term>Regulation approach</term><term>Regulationist research</term><term>Relational</term><term>Relational assets</term><term>Representational regime</term><term>Research strategies</term><term>Restructuring</term><term>Routledge</term><term>Sabel</term><term>Serious questions</term><term>Silicon</term><term>Silicon valley</term><term>Social base</term><term>Social capital</term><term>Social construction</term><term>Social regulation</term><term>Social relations</term><term>Social science</term><term>Social sciences</term><term>Soja</term><term>Spatial scales</term><term>Spatial selectivity</term><term>State form</term><term>State intervention</term><term>State managers</term><term>State power</term><term>State restructuring</term><term>State spaces</term><term>State strategies</term><term>Storper</term><term>Structuration</term><term>Successful regions</term><term>Swyngedouw</term><term>Technological innovation</term><term>Territorial government</term><term>Third section</term><term>Tickell</term><term>Time horizons</term><term>Uneven development</term><term>Uneven geography</term><term>Untraded interdependencies</term><term>Unwin hyman</term><term>Urban governance</term><term>Urban politics</term><term>Urban regimes</term><term>Urban theory</term><term>Valuable insights</term><term>Various scholars</term><term>Vital factor</term><term>Western europe</term><term>Whole range</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Amid the near frenzied exaltation of economic globalization and a purported decline of the nation state, a range of subnational regional economies and urban metropoles are increasingly being canonized as the paradigmatic exemplars of wealth creation. Indeed, across many of the advanced developed countries a whole host of academics, consultants, influential commentators, politicians and bourgeois interest groups are readily invoking the region to be the appropriate site for regulating global capitalism. In a recent article in IJURR, though, John Lovering disputes this emerging New Regionalism, viewing it to be seriously compromised by several practical and theoretical inadequacies. This article has two principal aims. First, and while sympathetic to the general tenor of Lovering’s critique, it offers a rejoinder through some sobering reflections on what might be recovered from the range of New Regionalist perspectives currently vying for attention within critical studies of regional development. Second, it presents a series of future theoretical directions for a geopolitically sensitive regional research agenda, drawing on recent thinking from the new regional geography, globalization and the politics of scale, institutional‐relational state theory and the regulation approach. An argument is made that a synthesis of these perspectives might intensify our understanding of the social and political construction of regions, the uneven geography of growth, and the moments of re‐scaled regionalized state power that now enframe the process of economic governance.</div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="fr">Au milieu de la quasi‐frénésie de la mondialisation économique et d’un soi‐disant déclin de l’État‐nation, diverses économies régionales et métropoles urbaines se trouvent – en nombre croissant –élevées au rang de modèles de création de richesses. En effet, dans beaucoup de pays avancés, tout un tas de groupes d’intérêt – universitaires, consultants, commentateurs reconnus, politiciens, bourgeois – invoquent volontiers la région comme lieu pertinent de la régulation du capitalisme mondial. Dans un récent article publié dans IJURR, John Lovering contestait cependant ce Nouveau Régionalisme naissant, plusieurs insuffisances pratiques et théoriques risquant de le compromettre, selon lui. Le présent article a deux objectifs principaux: d’une part, quoique sensible à la teneur générale de la critique de Lovering, il répond par quelques réflexions modérées sur ce qui pourrait être récupéré des diverses perspectives du Nouveau Régionalisme qui cherchent actuellement à attirer l’attention dans le cadre d’études critiques sur l’aménagement régional; d’autre part, l’article présente une série d’orientations théoriques futures pour un programme de recherche régional à tendance géopolitique, s’inspirant des dernières réflexions sur la nouvelle géographie régionale, la mondialisation et la politique d’échelle, ainsi que la théorie de l’état institutionnel‐relationnel et l’approche de la régulation. Il démontre ensuite qu’une synthèse de ces perspectives pourrait nous permettre de mieux comprendre la construction sociale et politique des régions, la géographie irrégulière de la croissance, ainsi que les phases d’un État redessinéà l’échelle régionale, lesquelles encadrent désormais le processus de gouvernance économique.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Royaume-Uni</li></country></list><tree><country name="Royaume-Uni"><noRegion><name sortKey="Macleod, Gordon" sort="Macleod, Gordon" uniqKey="Macleod G" first="Gordon" last="Macleod">Gordon Macleod</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sarre/explor/MusicSarreV3/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D18 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000D18 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sarre
|area= MusicSarreV3
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:D1D47EE35825136F33933E05A11A2D938F95944B
|texte= New Regionalism Reconsidered: Globalization and the Remaking of Political Economic Space
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |